Brussels Declaration
Brussels Declaration on Language Learning
Brussels Declaration on Language Learning | |||
The Federation of National Institutions for Language (EFNIL) was founded in Stockholm in 2003 as a network of the major language organisations and other national language bodies of the Member States of the European Union. Each member institution of EFNIL is closely involved and associated with the support and promotion of the language or languages of its country. The members of EFNIL are united in their conviction that the languages they are concerned with are integral components of European linguistic diversity and the basis of European cultural diversity and cultural wealth. In order to maintain and further develop their own languages and to promote a sense of shared European identity among the citizens of the states of the Union, the members of EFNIL support not only the learning and use of their national/official language or languages but also the learning of additional European languages. It is clearly in the interests of all individuals in Europe that they should be plurilingual. The overall aim is a plurilingual citizenry in a multilingual Europe. The members of EFNIL are committed to supporting this aim on the basis of the following observations and recommendations. | |||
1. | With European integration, the lowering and eventual fall of administrative barriers, the opportunities for communication between speakers of different languages are multiplying. To cope with this rising wave of language contacts, it is vital to develop new approaches, methods, and environments for multilingual translation, interpretation, and mediation as well as for foreign language instruction and learning with a view to reinforcing economic and cultural exchange and the mobility of the citizens for work and education in Europe. | ||
2. | English is used as a working language in certain professional, educational, and other social contexts in Europe, and while the practical value of this is acknowledged, it is considered of the utmost importance to maintain, strengthen, and further develop all national/official languages of the European countries in all their functional domains. | ||
3. | All citizens of a European country should have the opportunity to learn those foreign languages that they need most for work, social life, study, and personal development. They should have the right to acquire accredited certification for their level of competence to communicate in languages other than their own and to have their language certificates recognized as qualification for work and study in each member state. | ||
4. | Education in the European member states should foster a multilingual ethos of communication and opportunities to learn languages in addition to the first language of the learners. It should motivate the development of communicative competence in a variety of languages along with intercultural awareness. | ||
5. | EFNIL, therefore, appeals to the governments of the European states to strengthen and improve foreign language learning alongside instruction in each country’s national language(s). | ||
5.1 | Formal and informal education should offer a wide selection of languages, including all official European languages, wherever possible. | ||
5.2 | Communicative competence in 1+2-languages (= first language plus two other languages) should be the minimum goal within the primary and secondary educational system of each country. If the learner's first language is not an official language of the country, one of the two additional languages should be an official language. | ||
5.3 | Besides being able to use at least two other languages, the receptive use of additional languages should be encouraged in order to develop intercomprehension (whereby each speaker uses his or her own language and understands the other’s). | ||
5.4 | Adults should be encouraged to improve their competence in the national/official language(s) of their countries and to learn foreign languages. Life-long learning should include language learning. Opportunities for adult learning should be increased and improved at formal and informal adult educational settings, at the work place, and at other private and public institutions. | ||
5.5 | Alongside foreign language learning at home, opportunities for language learning abroad should be increased. In particular, the administrative conditions for the exchange of pupils, students, teachers, and workers between the Member States of the European Union should be improved. | ||
5.6 | In each Member State of the European Union, more and better opportunities should be given to non-native speakers (both children and adults) to learn the national language(s) of the state in which they reside and also to maintain and develop competence in their native language. | ||
6. | Both national governments and EU bodies should support the creation and production of more and improved linguistic tools and resources to enhance foreign language learning. Such tools and | ||
7. | As an empirical basis for national and European language policies, including language teaching and learning, a European language monitor (ELM) should be established, possibly as an expansion of the „European Indicator of Language Competence“ that is being prepared by the European Commission. The linguistic situation is in full flow and needs to be carefully monitored. The ELM would be an information system which regularly collects and evaluates data on linguistic conditions and how they are evolving in all states of the Union, including data on foreign language competence and foreign language instruction. The member organisations of EFNIL would be natural partners for such a monitor system. | ||
8. | EFNIL supports the Institutions of the European Union and the Council of Europe in their attempts and projects to maintain and strengthen a multilingual Europe through developing plurilingualism among the citizens of the European countries. | ||
9. | The member institutions of EFNIL are committed to extending their mutual collaboration in order to gain a deeper knowledge of the European languages and the linguistic situation in the European countries. Thus, they will be better equipped to spread understanding and acceptance of European multilingualism in their respective countries. |